Thursday, November 19, 2009

Democracy is no protection

No king or queen would ever have allowed any of this.

Europeans Meet (Soviet-Style) to Choose First-Ever EU President

In what has been described as a “slow-moving coup d’état,” Europe over the past several decades has experienced a gradual but significant shift in political power away from individual nation states towards an unelected and unaccountable bureaucracy based in Brussels.

Today, these so-called Eurocrats oversee more than 100,000 pages of EU legislation, much of which has primacy over national legislation and parliaments. Indeed, unelected bureaucrats in Brussels now exercise so much power that they dictate what elected leaders can or cannot do in more than 30 policy areas.

In 2004, European federalists moved to consolidate their power by means of the “European Constitution,” which, among many other things, called for abolishing the national veto in more than 50 additional policy areas. But the ratification process ran into a roadblock in May and June 2005, when French and Dutch voters rejected the document.

Predictably, the authors of the European Constitution were unwilling to let democracy get in the way of their federal ambitions. Instead, they essentially shuffled some of the words, sentences and paragraphs of the document and reissued it in December 2007 as the Lisbon Treaty, in order “to avoid having referendums.”

The Lisbon Treaty, which obligates EU nations to surrender their sovereignty in many areas to centralized decision-making, was supposed to have been quietly rubber-stamped by the parliaments of all member states by the end of 2008. But once again, democracy got in the way, this time thanks to Ireland, where the constitution mandated a popular referendum.

Indeed, Ireland, which accounts for 1 percent of the European Union’s 500 million population, was the only EU member state to put the Lisbon Treaty to a referendum. And sure enough, in June 2008, Irish voters soundly rejected the document.

Unsurprisingly, the Brussels elite were outraged at the audacity of the Irish insubordination and demanded that Ireland hold a second referendum, one that would produce the “correct” answer. EU Thought Police were dispatched to warn the “extremely arrogant” Irish voters of the dire consequences they would face in the event of another ‘no’ vote. In October 2009, Irish voters succumbed to the pressure and produced the desired result.

3 comments:

Howard J. Harrison said...

This is a fine blog. I am hardly yet persuaded to American monarchism, but I am glad to find you writing so vigorously in its support.

American Monarchist said...

Mr. Harrison, thank you. I admire your blog as well!

ZAROVE said...

Not to interfere, btu I actually think Democracy is the cause of loss of soverignty and freedom. Popel ar eless liekly to resist a Republican Government, fr they liv ein the delusion that they are free because they vote for their leaders, andbesides, its mainly a faceless mess of beucrocrats. Since all the politicians are also idealouges who tun on parties promoting an ideology itself, we also see them maign sweepign changes to secure mroe power or reshape society that Monarchy, base don tradition, woudl not do.

All base don short term political goals.

So rather than see Democracy as a protection for our liberty, I see it as the fastest way to erode it.